Source:                       www.forum18.org

Date:                            August 18, 2023

 

https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2852
By Victoria Arnold, Forum 18

A court in Siberia has handed musician and teacher Anna Chagina a fine and
a ban on posting on the internet as punishment for her opposition to
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Chagina stood accused of “discrediting"
the Russian armed forces more than once in a year – firstly, by
displaying a poster reading “Blessed are the peacemakers (Matthew 5:9)"
at an anti-war protest, and secondly, by making anti-war posts on social
media, including reposts of texts by religious philosopher Nikolay
Karpitsky.

On 7 August 2023, Soviet District Court in Tomsk fined Chagina 150,000
Roubles under Criminal Code Article 280.3 Part 1 ("Public actions aimed at
discrediting the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in order
to protect the interests of the Russian Federation and its citizens, [and]
maintain international peace and security") and prohibited her from
publishing anything online for 2 years (see below).

Judge Roman Zaynulin imposed the punishment “with the aim of restoring
social justice and preventing [Chagina] from committing a new offence." He
reduced the fine to 100,000 Roubles to account for time spent under
restrictions. 100,000 Roubles is equivalent to almost 6 weeks’ average
wages in Tomsk Region as of May 2023. It is unknown whether or not Chagina
will choose to appeal. In the meantime, Chagina must abide by travel
restrictions and a good behaviour order. According to the verdict, her
laptop will be returned when the verdict comes into force, but her mobile
phone will remain confiscated as it was “used in the commission of the
offence." (see below).

On 14 August, Forum 18 wrote to Soviet District Court and Tomsk Regional
Prosecutor’s Office, asking why a Biblical quotation (as in Chagina’s
first, administrative prosecution) and reposts of Karpitsky’s
observations on the war were considered “discreditation" of the Russian
armed forces, and whether the prosecution intended to challenge the
court’s verdict. No response has been received (see below).

In court, Chagina did not deny making the internet posts which led to her
conviction but pleaded not guilty, stating that she had always held
pacifist views: “There is the right, enshrined in law, to express any
opinion publicly. ‘No to war’ is [my] position, regardless of which
war" (see below).

“I also want to remind you of a simple ethical rule – do to others as
you would have them do to you," Chagina told the court in her final
statement. “I believe that we will be able to overcome this deepest
crisis that has arisen between our peoples, and I urge everyone to find
strength in ourselves and stop hating. Don't believe what they say. We have
no greater enemies than ourselves" (see below).

“When military action finally comes to an end and those who survive
return – and sooner or later, that will happen – the [Russian Orthodox
Church] will have to answer for its ideological support of the war,"
Chagina told Forum 18 through friends on 11 August, before the verdict came
into legal force. “I think a global crisis of faith awaits us inside the
ROC [Russian Orthodox Church]" (see below).

Mikhail Simonov, the first person to be sentenced to imprisonment for
opposing the war in Ukraine from a religious perspective, appealed
unsuccessfully against his conviction on 25 July 2023 at Moscow City Court
(see below).

On 30 March, Forum 18 asked the Federal Investigative Committee and its
Moscow branch, as well as Moscow City Prosecutor's Office, in what way
Simonov's comments could be construed as motivated by hatred of a political
or social group, and why it was necessary to have a 63-year-old man with
health problems placed in detention. Forum 18 has received no reply to any
of these questions (see below).

On 30 March, Simonov had received a 7-year prison term under Criminal Code
Article 207.3 ("Public dissemination, under the guise of credible
statements, of knowingly false information on the use of the Armed Forces
of the Russian Federation") for making online comments condemning the war,
including one which said “We, Russia, have become godless. Forgive us,
Lord!" He is currently in transit within the prison system and it remains
unknown where he will serve his sentence (see below).

Ongoing and new cases

Father Ioann Kurmoyarov (of a branch of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside
Russia not in communion with the Moscow Patriarchate), the only person
currently on trial for opposing the war in Ukraine on religious grounds,
has been in custody in St Petersburg’s Kresty-2 prison since June 2022
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2756). The judge in his
case rejected his latest petition to be placed under lesser restrictions on
28 June 2023. In August 2022, Darya Lebedeva, head of the joint court
system press service for St Petersburg, insisted to Forum 18 that Fr Ioann
had to be held in detention
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2763) because: "if at
liberty and not isolated from society, Kurmoyarov may continue his criminal
activity, conceal himself from investigators and the court, destroy
evidence and otherwise interfere with the criminal proceedings".

Fr Ioann is on trial under Criminal Code Article 207.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) ("Public
dissemination, under the guise of credible statements, of knowingly false
information on the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation") for
posting anti-war videos on YouTube, and is next due to appear in court on
22 August 2023.

In early August, the Investigative Committee in Moscow opened a criminal
case against Baptist pastor Yury Sipko, the former head of the Russian
Baptist Union. He is under investigation under Criminal Code Article 207.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) ("Public
dissemination, under the guise of credible statements, of knowingly false
information on the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation"),
Part 2 Paragraph D ("based on political, ideological, racial, national, or
religious hatred or enmity, or based on hatred or enmity against any social
group"). Investigators raided Sipko’s home in Moscow, but could not
arrest him as he had already left the country – they have now had him
placed on the Interior Ministry’s wanted list (see forthcoming F18News
article).

Federal Security Service (FSB) investigators in Kaluga also searched the
home of Pentecostal bishop Albert Ratkin on 8 August, and took him in for
questioning. He was later released and is so far being treated as a witness
in Sipko’s case (see forthcoming F18News article).

Administrative Code cases for opposition to the war on grounds of faith or
with the use of religious imagery and quotations continue to be brought.
Cases in 2023 have included Eduard Charov
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2835), who was fined in
April for "discrediting" the Armed Forces and "inciting hatred" towards
state authorities after he criticised Russia's invasion of Ukraine on
social media, asking "Would Jesus Christ have gone to kill in Ukraine?".

Conscientious objectors to military service have been jailed, such as
Pentecostal Andrey Kapatsyna who refused to fight in Ukraine, telling
commanders that "in accordance with his religious beliefs, he could not
take up arms and use them against other people."
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2848) On 29 June 2023, a
Vladivostok court sentenced him to 2 years, 10 months' imprisonment under
new legislation punishing non-fulfilment of orders in a period of combat
operations. There is no legal or practical provision for alternative
civilian service (ACS) during mobilisation
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2797), despite the
Constitution guaranteeing this right for every citizen.

“Discreditation" and “False information"

Specific penalties for criticising Russia's actions in its renewed war
against Ukraine came into force on 4 March 2022. These include
Administrative Code Article 20.3.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) ("Public actions
aimed at discrediting the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian
Federation"), which is used against apparently any form of anti-war
statement either in public spaces or online, and Criminal Code Article
207.3 (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) ("Public
dissemination, under the guise of credible statements, of knowingly false
information on the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation").

If individuals commit an offence covered by Administrative Code Article
20.3.3 more than once within a year, they may be prosecuted under Criminal
Code Article 280.3 (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737)
("Public actions aimed at discrediting the use of the Armed Forces of the
Russian Federation in order to protect the interests of the Russian
Federation and its citizens, [and] maintain international peace and
security").

On 28 March 2023, a series of amendments
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2822) to the Criminal Code
came into legal force, increasing penalties for disseminating "false
information" about and repeatedly "discrediting" the Russian Armed Forces
(Criminal Code Articles 207.3 and 280.3). The amendments also widen the
definition of these offences (and of Administrative Code Article 20.3.3) to
include criticism of "volunteer formations, organisations and individuals
who assist in the fulfilment of tasks assigned to the Armed Forces of the
Russian Federation" (that is, private mercenary units).

Under Criminal Code Article 280.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) ("Public actions
aimed at discrediting the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
in order to protect the interests of the Russian Federation and its
citizens, [and] maintain international peace and security"), Part 1, the
maximum prison sentence was raised from 3 years to 5 years. Under Part 2,
the same offence if resulting in "death by negligence", harm to health or
property, or mass public disorder, the penalty was raised from 5 years to 7
years.

Under Criminal Code Article 207.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) ("Public
dissemination, under the guise of credible statements, of knowingly false
information on the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation"),
Part 1, the maximum prison sentence was raised from 3 years to 5 years
(Part 2 remains unchanged).

Russian Orthodox (ROCOR) priest Nikandr Pinchuk was the first person to
receive a criminal conviction for opposing Russia's war in Ukraine on
religious grounds (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2783). On
17 October 2022, a court in the Urals fined him two months' average local
wage under Criminal Code Article 280.3, for a social media post condemning
the "horde of the Antichrist" attacking Ukraine. Neither Verkhoturye
District Court nor Prosecutor's Office replied to Forum 18's questions on
why expressing religious views on the war in Ukraine should be considered
"discreditation" of the Armed Forces and incur such a large fine.

Tomsk: fine and ban on internet posts for “discrediting" the army

On 7 August 2023, Anna Sergeyevna Chagina (born 29 November 1979) made her
tenth and final appearance at Soviet District Court in Tomsk on a charge of
repeatedly “discrediting" the Russian armed forces.

Judge Roman Zaynulin found her guilty and imposed a fine of 150,000 Roubles
and a 2-year ban on making online publications. He reduced the fine to
100,000 Roubles to take into account the one day Chagina was detained after
her arrest, and the time she spent under restrictions during the
investigation and awaiting trial. 100,000 Roubles is equivalent to almost 6
weeks’ average wages in Tomsk Region as of May 2023.

In her final statement to the court, Chagina – a viola player and music
teacher – said that she believed that war, “no matter what it is called
– a special military operation, or something else – causes irreparable
harm [and] damage to our countries and human destinies," the Vtomske.ru
local news website reported on 7 August. “I believe that no one can win a
war. Only love, which always remains, can win. Even now, when our soldiers
are shooting at each other, when people are dying, it still remains."

“We have the opportunity to finish this as soon as possible. This is our
responsibility. I want to remind those who consider themselves Christians
that Kiev is the mother of Russian cities," Chagina added.

“I also want to remind you of a simple ethical rule – do to others as
you would have them do to you. I believe that we will be able to overcome
this deepest crisis that has arisen between our peoples, and I urge
everyone to find strength in ourselves and stop hating. Don't believe what
they say. We have no greater enemies than ourselves."

Prosecutors had sought a fine of 200,000 Roubles and a 3-year ban on
posting material online. The maximum punishment Chagina could have received
under Criminal Code Article 280.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) ("Public actions
aimed at discrediting the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
in order to protect the interests of the Russian Federation and its
citizens, [and] maintain international peace and security"), Part 1, was 3
years’ imprisonment. This was because her alleged offence took place
before the March 2023 increase
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2822) in possible
sentences.

The verdict has not yet entered legal force. Chagina has not yet decided
whether to appeal, she told Forum 18 through friends on 11 August - she has
15 days to do so from the date the verdict was issued. Akt-Produkt, an
independent St Petersburg-based record label with which Chagina has
collaborated, noted on VKontakte on 13 August that supporters had already
managed to raise enough money to pay the fine.

In the meantime, Chagina must abide by travel restrictions and a good
behaviour order. According to the verdict, her laptop will be returned when
the verdict comes into force, but her mobile phone will remain confiscated
as it was “used in the commission of the offence."

First conviction

Criminal Code Article 280.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) punishes those who
“discredit" the Russian armed forces more than once within a year.
Chagina's first conviction for this was for displaying a poster reading
“Blessed are the peacemakers (Matthew 5:9)" at an anti-war protest in
Tomsk in March 2022 (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2814),
just two days after the new offence of “discreditation" came into force.
“Many times after [the arrest for the poster], I inwardly turned to these
words of Christ and realised that peacemaking begins with what is in a
person's heart (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2819),"
Chagina told Forum 18 through friends on 11 March 2023.

On 14 March 2022 she was fined 45,000 Roubles
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2814) under Administrative
Code Article 20.3.3 (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737)
("Public actions aimed at discrediting the use of the Armed Forces of the
Russian Federation"), Part 1, also at Soviet District Court in Tomsk.

Second accusation of “discreditation"

The second accusation of “discreditation," which led to Chagina’s
criminal prosecution, derived from a number of posts she made on her
profile page on the VKontakte social network
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2814), which a witness
allegedly came across by chance and reported to an acquaintance in the FSB.
In summer 2022, Chagina had begun to notice that she was being followed.
After her arrest in autumn 2022, the investigator remarked that all the
local police already knew her, media outlet Govorit Ne Moskva (which
specialises in regional stories) noted in December 2022.

After her second arrest on 30 November 2022, the court placed her under
specific restrictions
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2814), including a
night-time curfew, a ban on using the internet and postal service, and the
use of an electronic tag. Chagina continued to have to wear the tag for
more than seven months, until prison service officials removed it at the
start of July to use on another person, as they had run out of devices.

Those internet posts cited in the August 2023 court verdict, seen by Forum
18, comprise a post on 12 May 2022 saying that she had signed human rights
defender Lev Ponomaryov's change.org petition
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2814) against Russia's
renewed invasion of Ukraine, and another on 7 June 2022 saying “NO TO
WAR" (with a link to a news report on the State Duma’s proposed creation
of more war-related criminal offences), as well as three reposts of texts
from the Facebook page of Nikolay Karpitsky
(https://www.facebook.com/nikolai.karpitsky).



Karpitsky is a religious philosopher from Tomsk who now lives in Slovyansk
in Ukraine (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2819). He has
documented the experience of wartime life almost every day since the
invasion and produced a series of videos on YouTube
(https://www.youtube.com/user/karpizky) entitled “War from the point of
view of religion."

Karpitsky’s texts which feature in the court’s written verdict are
those (of 3 May, 28 May, and 11 June 2022) which accuse Russian forces of
targeting Ukrainian homes and civilian infrastructure. These include:
“After all, they will not spare anyone. First, they will demolish
everything they can with artillery. Then, on the cleared territory, the
intelligence services will look for ‘Nazis’, that is, to torture and
kill all those who are suspicious. And then the city will be given to the
gopniks [thugs, delinquents] for plunder, who will kill just for the sake
of entertainment. Thus they have already acted in Bucha and other cities."

The Investigative Committee and experts for the prosecution determined that
these posts characterised Russian troops’ actions as “predatory,
dangerous, [and] violent."

A number of other materials from Chagina’s VKontakte page contributed to
the Investigative Committee’s 30 November 2022 decision to charge her
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2814) (seen by Forum 18),
though do not appear in the final indictment or verdict.

These included a 17 May 2022 repost from the “Libertarnaya Teologiya"
VKontakte page (https://vk.com/christian_socialism), with information about
and links to download a book entitled “The long road of Russian pacifism:
the ideal of international and internal peace in the
religious-philosophical and socio-political thought of Russia" (ed. T.
Shchapov, Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1997).
This included the quotation: “Saints who acquired inner peace, according
to hagiographic literature, almost always became peacemakers in both the
private and political life of ancient Rus' .. With their lives, they
testified that only by renouncing selfish aspirations, life ‘according to
the elements of this world’, affirming oneself in love for God and
neighbour, can a person defeat evil – not to slay it with a sword, but to
absorb it into oneself and dissolve it by the effort of faith and love."

In court, Chagina did not deny making the posts but pleaded not guilty,
stating that she had always held pacifist views: “There is the right,
enshrined in law, to express any opinion publicly. ‘No to war’ is [my]
position, regardless of which war."

August 2023 verdict

Judge Zaynulin found no mitigating or exacerbating circumstances in the
case, and “taking into account the effect of the chosen punishment on the
correction of the guilty person" and “with the aim of restoring social
justice and preventing [Chagina] from committing a new offence," decided to
impose a fine and 2 years’ “deprivation of the right to carry out
activities related to administration of sites on electronic and
information-telecommunication networks, including the internet, and the
posting of information on them for public access."

Forum 18 wrote to Soviet District Court and Tomsk Regional Prosecutor’s
Office on 14 August, asking why a Biblical quotation (as in Chagina’s
first, administrative prosecution
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2814)) and reposts of
Karpitsky’s observations on the war were considered “discreditation" of
the Russian armed forces, and whether the prosecution intended to challenge
the court’s verdict. No response has been received.

“A global crisis of faith awaits us inside the Russian Orthodox Church"

“As far as my religious life is concerned, everything has remained the
same: I go to church, nobody has tried to limit my freedom of belief in any
way," Chagina told Forum 18 through friends on 11 August, before the
verdict came into legal force.

“When military action finally comes to an end and those who survive
return – and sooner or later, that will happen – the [Russian Orthodox
Church] will have to answer for its ideological support of the war
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2809). If Russia openly
recognises its defeat, the Church will be emotionally responsible for this
before society.

“There are already few people now in the churches, on weekdays there’s
almost nobody at all. And after the war, I think a global crisis of faith
awaits us inside the ROC [Russian Orthodox Church]. There are priests who
are generally afraid to speak
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2763), and this fear is not
just of the state, but also of the people. It is as if an abyss has grown
between pastor and flock."

Moscow: 7-year prison sentence upheld

Mikhail Yuryevich Simonov (born 27 January 1960), the first person to
receive a prison sentence for his religiously motivated opposition to the
war in Ukraine (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2822),
appealed unsuccessfully against his conviction on 25 July 2023 at Moscow
City Court.

The Investigative Committee’s case against Simonov was based on two
comments he made on the VKontakte social network in March 2022
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2822): "Killing children
and women, on Channel One [television] we sing songs. We, Russia, have
become godless [bezbozhniki]. Forgive us, Lord!"; and "Russian pilots are
bombing children."

On 30 March 2023, the capital’s Timiryazevsky District Court found
Simonov guilty (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2822) under
Criminal Code Article 207.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) ("Public
dissemination, under the guise of credible statements, of knowingly false
information on the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation"),
Part 2 Part D ("based on political, ideological, racial, national, or
religious hatred or enmity, or based on hatred or enmity against any social
group"). He was sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment.

On 30 March, Forum 18 asked the Federal Investigative Committee and its
Moscow branch, as well as Moscow City Prosecutor's Office
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2822), in what way
Simonov's comments could be construed as motivated by hatred of a political
or social group, and why it was necessary to have a 63-year-old man with
health problems placed in detention. Forum 18 also asked Moscow City
Prosecutor's Office why prosecutors had requested such a long prison
sentence of 7 years. Forum 18 has received no reply to any of these
questions.

Simonov is still in transit within the prison system, a person following
the case told Forum 18, and as of early August, he was being held at
Investigation Prison No. 2 in Tsivilsk in the Chuvash Republic. It is as
yet unknown where he will serve his sentence.

Simonov remained in detention throughout the investigation and trial and
between his conviction and appeal, and is therefore deemed to have already
served 13 and a half months of his prison term. He is thus likely to be due
for release in June 2029 – after which he will be subject to a 4-year ban
on some online activities.

At Simonov’s appeal hearing, his lawyer Aleksandr Aldayev argued that
Criminal Code Article 207.3
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2737) contravenes
international law, RusNews reported on its Telegram channel on 25 July.
Simonov himself stated that he “did not fully understand the essence of
the charge against him," and that pleaded guilty only to the offence of
“Public dissemination of knowingly false information under the guise of
authentic information" (ie. Article 207.3 Part 1), denying that he had been
motivated by “political hatred." The appeal judge refused, however, to
reclassify the charge against him. (END)

Full reports on freedom of thought, conscience and belief in Russia
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?query=&religion=all&country=10)

For more background see Forum 18's survey of the general state of freedom
of religion and belief in Russia
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2246), as well as Forum
18's survey of the dramatic decline in this freedom related to Russia's
Extremism Law (https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2215)

A personal commentary by the Director of the SOVA Center for Information
and Analysis (https://www.sova-center.ru), Alexander Verkhovsky, about the
systemic problems of Russian "anti-extremism" laws
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=1468)

Forum 18's compilation of Organisation for Security and Co-operation in
Europe (OSCE) freedom of religion or belief commitments
(https://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=1351)

Follow us on Twitter @Forum_18 (https://twitter.com/forum_18)

Follow us on Facebook @Forum18NewsService
(https://www.facebook.com/Forum18NewsService)

Follow us on Telegram @Forum18NewsService
(https://t.me/s/forum18newsservice)

All Forum 18 text may be referred to, quoted from, or republished in full,
if Forum 18 is credited as the source.

All photographs that are not Forum 18's copyright are attributed to the
copyright owner. If you reuse any photographs from Forum 18's website, you
must seek permission for any reuse from the copyright owner or abide by the
copyright terms the copyright owner has chosen.

© Forum 18 News Service. All rights reserved. ISSN 1504-2855.